![]() ![]() ![]() But in theory it's possible.įor what it's worth, Knack charges by the number of apps (individual databases) and the max number of records but provides for unlimited users. From a security standpoint this is a terrible idea. A "user account" is of course supposed to be a person, but it could be a shared staff account at a small organization. Have you considered a Plus plan?Īirtable (like the new Baserow.io) base their pricing partly on record quotas, but they charge by the user account. Yes I agree: pricing is one of Airtable's major weaknesses, from my perspective as a consultant. What we've started doing is organizing all the big data in Airtable and then when it requires collaboration that data is then copied over into Google Sheets and a larger group of people chime in and make changes, and then unfortunately those changes are manually copied back over as needed, but at least it's better than paying almost $1000 more to add 4 more collaborators to the base. I run a large book club community on Discord and Airtable is the backbone for a large amount of information tracking and things that we do, but I am buried under the volume of data that we use to it to track and the cost required to add more people to help me manage it since I'm already paying for myself and another person out of pocket. The fact that Pro is $20 per person per month is just not reasonable for personal or non-profit use (in my opinion). ![]() I have been using Airtable for about 8 years now and I have no plans of stopping, but I also find their pricing structure to be absolutely ridiculous and not really attainable for small businesses let alone anything that isn't a money generating venture. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |